It’s a done deal – Biden is running for another term:
Biden spokesman David Wade said Sunday that Biden will continue his Senate re-election campaign. Biden is expected to defeat Republican challenger Christine O’Donnell in November.
Assuming the Obama-Biden ticket is successful in November (let’s hope), Biden will resign his Senate seat after being sworn in for another term in early January. The task will then fall to outgoing Democratic Gov. Ruth Ann Minner to appoint a successor for Biden. Possible contenders include Delaware AG Beau Biden and the loser of the state’s gubernatorial primary between Lt. Gov. John Carney and state Treasurer Jack Markell. However, the younger Biden’s senatorial aspirations (assuming he has any) may be complicated by his deployment to Iraq in October.
I can understand the concern about potential political dynasties. But they aren’t necessarily bad.
But I think it would just be very interesting to see how the Washington establishment reacts to a deployed soldier being named as a Senator.
I assume CinC Obama (or actually his Sec of Defense to be) can order Beau’s tour deferred while serving as a Senator
Or does anyone fine this whole process somewhat reeking of political entitlement? If Joe resigning to get sworn in as VP and his son getting to take his place is bad enough, there’s this law in your country in some states that allow the incumbent to run for reelection to the Senate even though they are seeking another office in the same year?
It seems to me the honorable thing to do would be to resign your seat and then run for Vice President, so you would be able to fully commit your political energies to getting Obama in the Oval Office. The only argument I can find is that running for reelection provides a safety valve for (in this case) an honorable and dedicated public servant to continue his service.
Too bad John Edwards couldn’t do that in 2004. Or could he (does North Carolina do the same as Delaware?), or did he just choose on his own not to serve another term that year?
from the article:
So actually, those couple hours could make the difference whether Minner does the pick, or whether the next governor does the pick.
And while it also says this:
Lee did get 45% of the vote four years ago against the incumbent Minner. Given the demographics of Delaware, that means either he cleaned up among Independents, or there were a substantial number of Democrats who voted for him. And given how Minner’s term has seemed lackluster at best, what if there’s a buyer’s remorse in Delaware that has them giving Lee a second look?
I think we underestimate the DE-Gov race at our own peril if we simply assume it’s in the bag for us. Keep in mind they keep sending a Republican to the House, and will almost certainly do so again, even as they pull the lever for Obama/Biden.
this is the safest course. and by janueary 20th joe biden will be well aware of who is the elected governor of Delaware and will insure that it is a Democrat who does the appointing – whether it’s minner or her successor is immaterial. i recall that dan quayle resigned early inorder to insure the republican governor who was leaving got to appoint his replacement.
and it does reek of family entitlement which would probably make it a better choice to appoint the loser of the Gov primary although having a democratic serviceman in the US Senate could be a very powerful symbol as well.